Instructions and Resources
Social Media Guidelines
Using Social Media Responsibly
Please see the following resources for general guidance on responsible use of social media:
- General Medical Council (2013) Doctors’ Use of Social Media
- Health & Care Professions Council (2018) Guidance on the Use of Social Media
- Nursing & Midwifery Council (2019) Social Media Guidance
Assignment Guidance
See below for how to carry out the assignment on different platforms:
Twitter/X
- Create or use an existing Twitter/X account and follow your peers, colleagues, and tutor.
- Inform your tutor of your Twitter/X account.
- Follow relevant societies and high-quality journals.
- Post 2–4 times per week. Quality is more important than quantity.
- Posts should relate to module topics, relevant guidelines, review articles, or the latest research.
- Include key learning points and highlights from your readings.
- DO NOT simply repost from other sources.
- No references are required in tweets.
- DO NOT post patient-identifiable data or personal/social comments directed toward individuals or institutions.
- No word limit or report submission is required at the end of the module.
YouTube
- Create or use an existing YouTube account (a Google account also works).
- Inform your tutor of your YouTube account.
- Videos must not contain patient-identifiable data. Use a dummy or PowerPoint presentation for demonstrations.
- There is no time limit, but a 5-minute length is recommended.
- If social media is blocked in your country, submit your video to us, and we will upload it on your behalf.
Marking Rubric
Grade | Evidence Base & Clinical Knowledge | Communication & Engagement | Digital Presence |
---|---|---|---|
Distinction | Excellent evidence-based content with integration of critically appraised current research and guidelines. Excellent critical appraisal of sources and depth of knowledge of the topic. |
Excellent audience engagement and platform-appropriate communication. Excellent clarity of message with highly effective educational approach. |
Excellent professional presence and creativity within professional bounds. Excellent platform optimisation and audience awareness. |
Merit | Strong evidence-based content with good use of current research and guidelines. Clear critical appraisal and good knowledge of the topic. |
Good audience engagement and communication style. Clear messaging with an effective education approach. |
Strong professional presence and creative elements. Effective platform use and good audience awareness. |
Pass | Adequate evidence-based content and use of research and guidelines. Some critical appraisal and knowledge of topic. |
Adequate audience engagement and communication style. Acceptable messaging and educational approach. |
Adequate professional presence with some areas of creativity. Acceptable use of platform and audience aware. |
Fail | Poor evidence base with limited use of research and guidelines. Lack of critical appraisal and inadequate knowledge of topic. |
Poor engagement with audience and communication style. Unclear messaging and ineffective education approach. |
Poor professional presence and limited creativity. Ineffective use of platform and poor audience awareness. |
Fail | Automatic fail for failure to adhere to professional guidance or to protect patient confidentiality and identifiable patient data. |